Economy · Capital Market, Stock Exchanges & SEBI

UPSC Prelims 2025, Question 8

The concept being tested: Indian stock market development; equity options trading and regulatory oversight.

Consider the following statements: I. India accounts for a very large portion of all equity option contracts traded globally thus exhibiting a great boom. II. India's stock market has grown rapidly in the recent past even overtaking Hong Kong's at some point of time. III. There is no regulatory body either to warn the small investors about the risks of options trading or to act on unregistered financial advisors in this regard. Which of the statements given above are correct?

Options

  1. AI and II onlyCorrect answer
  2. BII and III only
  3. CI and III only
  4. DI, II and III

The answer: I and II only

Both quantitative claims trace to widely reported 2023-24 market developments. On equity options, SEBI's own study and exchange data showed India accounting for a dominant share of all equity option contracts traded worldwide by number of contracts, a boom fuelled by weekly index options on the Nifty and Bank Nifty and a surge in retail futures-and-options participation. Separately, in January 2024 India's stock market capitalisation overtook Hong Kong's, making India briefly the world's fourth-largest equity market, a milestone that drew wide financial-press coverage. Statement III fails because SEBI is very much the regulator on both fronts: it runs investor-awareness campaigns specifically flagging options-trading risk, having found in its own 2023 study that nine out of ten individual F&O traders lose money, and it holds direct powers under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 to act against unregistered advisors and finfluencers.

What UPSC was testing

The trap sits in statement III's plausible-sounding claim of a regulatory vacuum. Aspirants who recall media coverage of finfluencer scams and options-trading losses may assume no formal oversight exists, when SEBI already covers both functions, investor risk-awareness and action against unregistered advisors, making the statement-count format punish anyone who skips verifying the negative claim.

How often this comes up

This concept has appeared 14 times in UPSC Prelims General Studies Paper I between 2015 and 2025 — in 2016, 2019, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.

The option-by-option autopsy for this question — why each of the other three is wrong, and which neighbouring concept each one was built from — is in the app.

More questions on this

Other past-year questions touching Capital Market, Stock Exchanges & SEBI.