PPrelimo← Home

Economy · Capital Market, Stock Exchanges & SEBI

UPSC Prelims 2025, Question 7

The concept being tested: Bonds vs Equity - creditor priority, ownership structure, and investment risk hierarchy.

Consider the following statements: Statement I: As regards returns from an investment in a company, generally, bondholders are considered to be relatively at lower risk than stockholders. Statement II: Bondholders are lenders to a company whereas stockholders are its owners. Statement III: For repayment purpose, bondholders are prioritized over stockholders by a company. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Options

  1. ABoth Statement II and Statement III are correct and both of them explain Statement ICorrect answer
  2. BBoth Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement I explains Statement II
  3. COnly one of the Statements II and III is correct and that explains Statement I
  4. DNeither Statement II nor Statement III is correct

The answer: Both Statement II and Statement III are correct and both of them explain Statement I

Bondholders are creditors who lend money to a company, while stockholders are its owners with a residual claim on profits and assets. This creditor-versus-owner distinction is exactly what Statement II says. Because a company's debt obligations are contractual, interest and principal owed to bondholders must legally be paid before any dividend to stockholders, and in a liquidation or wind-up, creditors are settled ahead of shareholders too, which is Statement III. It is precisely this fixed, first-in-line claim that makes a bondholder's return more secure and predictable than a stockholder's residual, uncertain one, which is what Statement I asserts. Statement I is thus not an independent fact but an outcome explained by Statements II and III together, making the option that credits both II and III as correct and explanatory the accurate one.

What UPSC was testing

The trap is in the statement-relationship format itself: a candidate who confirms all three statements as individually true can still pick wrong by misreading which statement explains which, since UPSC is testing the direction of causation, that II and III together explain I, and not merely the factual accuracy of each statement in isolation.

How often this comes up

This concept has appeared 14 times in UPSC Prelims General Studies Paper I between 2015 and 2025 — in 2016, 2019, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.

The option-by-option autopsy for this question — why each of the other three is wrong, and which neighbouring concept each one was built from — is in the app.

More questions on this

Other past-year questions touching Capital Market, Stock Exchanges & SEBI.

UPSC 2025 · Q4

Consider the following statements: I. The Reserve Bank of India mandates all the listed companies in India to submit a…

UPSC 2025 · Q8

Consider the following statements: I. India accounts for a very large portion of all equity option contracts traded…

UPSC 2025 · Q1

With reference to investments, consider the following: I. Bonds II. Hedge Funds III. Stocks IV. Venture Capital How…