PPrelimo← Home

Daily quiz archive · 30 July 2026

Daily Current Affairs Quiz for UPSC Prelims 2027 — 30 July 2026

Of this day’s ten questions, 9 were built from that morning’s news. They are below, with the answers. The rest of the set came from Prelimo’s practice bank and stays in the app, because a bank question can still turn up in a live quiz.

Each question below is followed by the keyed answer, why that answer is right, and the static syllabus concept the question is really testing. Where a question came from a specific news story, that story is linked.

Q1 · Social Issues · Education Policy — NEP & Curriculum Reform

Parliament's recent passage of a stricter law against examination malpractice has renewed attention on how an ordinary Bill actually becomes an Act of Parliament. Which of the following correctly completes this process?

  1. AIt is passed by the Lok Sabha with a two-thirds majority
  2. BIt also requires the approval of the Chief Justice of India
  3. CIt is passed by the Rajya Sabha as well, and then receives the assent of the President of IndiaCorrect answer
  4. DIt is approved by the Union Cabinet and notified by the Ministry of Law and Justice

Why this answer

An ordinary Bill becomes an Act only after it is passed by BOTH Houses of Parliament — the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha — and then receives the assent of the President of India under Article 111 of the Constitution; passage in the Lok Sabha alone, however it was passed, is not enough. A simple majority of members present and voting is what is needed for an ordinary Bill, not a two-thirds majority, which is reserved for specific situations such as amending entrenched constitutional provisions. The judiciary, including the Chief Justice of India, plays no role in the legislative-assent process. The Union Cabinet's approval is a pre-introduction political step, and Gazette notification by the Ministry of Law and Justice is a post-enactment administrative act — neither substitutes for passage by the second House and Presidential assent.

The static concept

Legislative process — how an ordinary Bill becomes an Act of Parliament; Presidential assent under Article 111.

From the news: No shots fired at students, says Union Minister Jitendra Singh as Lok Sabha passes tougher anti-paper leak Bill

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q2 · Science & Tech · AI, Quantum Computing & Emerging Technologies

The increasing application of advanced technologies like Artificial Intelligence and genomics in public healthcare in India is supported by a specific policy and institutional framework. Which one of the following statements most accurately describes an aspect of this framework?

  1. ANITI Aayog's 'National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence' identified healthcare as a key focus sector for leveraging AI to improve public health outcomes.Correct answer
  2. BThe GenomeIndia project, which aims to create a reference genome for precision medicine, is an initiative led by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
  3. CPublic-Private Partnerships in health infrastructure are financially supported through the Viability Gap Funding (VGF) scheme, administered primarily by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
  4. DThe National Health Policy of 2017 was the first national-level policy to introduce a programme specifically for cancer control, replacing earlier multi-disease frameworks.

Why this answer

The statement about NITI Aayog's 'National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence' is correct. This strategy, released in 2018, explicitly identified healthcare as a priority sector for AI application. The statement attributing the GenomeIndia project to ICMR is incorrect; it is an initiative of the Department of Biotechnology (DBT). The statement regarding the Viability Gap Funding (VGF) scheme is also incorrect; it is administered by the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, not the Ministry of Health. Lastly, the statement about the National Health Policy 2017 being the first for cancer control is false; the National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) was launched much earlier in 1975.

The static concept

Policy framework for technology in healthcare, including the roles of NITI Aayog, Department of Biotechnology, and mechanisms for Public-Private Partnerships.

From the news: A.P. inks pact with AstraZeneca to set up Genomic Solutions Centre in Amaravati

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q3 · Internal Security · Security Forces Organization & Operations

In the context of India's long-standing efforts to counter Left-Wing Extremism (LWE), which one of the following statements most accurately describes the government's overarching strategy?

  1. AIt follows a multi-pronged approach, formally articulated in the National Policy and Action Plan of 2015, combining security interventions with development initiatives and ensuring the rights of local communities.Correct answer
  2. BThe strategy primarily relies on centrally-coordinated armed operations, as 'Public Order' related to insurgency is a subject under the Union List of the Constitution.
  3. CThe core of the strategy revolves around large-scale infrastructure projects funded exclusively through the Special Central Assistance (SCA) scheme to address developmental deficits.
  4. DIt focuses on countering the influence of external state actors providing military and financial support, which has been identified as the primary driver of the insurgency.

Why this answer

The correct option accurately describes India's holistic strategy towards LWE, which was formally approved as the 'National Policy and Action Plan' in 2015. This strategy is multi-pronged, encompassing security, development, and securing rights and entitlements of local communities. The option stating the strategy is primarily security-based is incorrect because 'Police' and 'Public Order' are State subjects under the Seventh Schedule, not Union subjects. The option focusing exclusively on the Special Central Assistance (SCA) scheme is too narrow; the SCA is just one component of a much broader developmental strategy. Lastly, while external support can be a factor in some insurgencies, the primary drivers of LWE have been consistently identified as internal socio-economic issues like poverty, deprivation, and lack of access to resources.

The static concept

India's strategy for countering Left-Wing Extremism (LWE), combining security measures and development initiatives.

From the news: Why Misir Besra’s arrest could mark the end of the Maoist insurgency

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q4 · International Relations · India–South Asia Relations

Recent high-level diplomatic engagements, including the upcoming BRICS summit in India, have highlighted the evolving dynamics of India's foreign policy. Which one of the following statements most accurately reflects a key aspect of India's current relations with BRICS or its major partners?

  1. AIn the fiscal year 2025-26, China has become India's largest trading partner, surpassing the United States, despite a significant and widening trade deficit.Correct answer
  2. BIndia and Russia elevated their relationship to a 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership' in 2000, which is primarily driven by a shared goal of reaching USD 100 billion in bilateral trade by 2030.
  3. CThe BRICS grouping expanded significantly in 2024 by admitting five new members, including major West Asian economies, but has yet to include any country from Southeast Asia.
  4. DAs the host of the 18th BRICS Summit, India's chairship theme for 2026 is 'One Earth, One Family, One Future', reflecting its commitment to global unity and sustainable development.

Why this answer

The statement that China has become India's largest trading partner in FY 2025-26, despite a widening trade deficit, is factually correct. The other statements contain specific errors. The India-Russia relationship was elevated to a 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership' in 2010, not 2000. While BRICS did expand in 2024, the claim that it includes no Southeast Asian members is incorrect, as Indonesia joined in early 2025. The theme 'One Earth, One Family, One Future' was associated with India's G20 Presidency in 2023, not its 2026 BRICS Chairship, whose theme is 'Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability'.

The static concept

India's role in multilateral groupings (BRICS) and its bilateral strategic partnerships (with China and Russia).

From the news: India getting ready for Xi, Putin visits in September

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q5 · Environment · Environmental Law, Institutions & Governance

With reference to the Environmental Clearance (EC) process in India, consider the following statements:

  1. 1.The Supreme Court has ruled that post-facto environmental clearances are impermissible under any circumstances, reinforcing the sanctity of the prior clearance regime.
  2. 2.The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, is a form of delegated legislation issued by the Central Government under powers granted by the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
  3. 3.Following a recent Supreme Court ruling quashing an office memorandum on post-facto clearances, all clearances previously granted under that memorandum are now considered void ab initio.
  4. 4.The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, was enacted by the Parliament under Article 253 of the Constitution to implement decisions from the Stockholm Conference.

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. AOnly one
  2. BOnly twoCorrect answer
  3. COnly three
  4. DAll four

Why this answer

Statement 1 is incorrect. The Supreme Court ruled that while post-facto ECs cannot be granted via administrative orders, the Central Government retains the power to create 'tailored amnesty schemes' through a valid statutory notification under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Thus, they are not prohibited under all circumstances. Statement 2 is correct. The EIA Notification, 2006, is a subordinate legislative instrument issued by the MoEF&CC exercising its powers under Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Supreme Court's decision to quash the 2021 Office Memorandum has a prospective effect. It does not automatically invalidate clearances already granted under it; those remain valid unless challenged individually on their merits. Statement 4 is correct. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, is an umbrella legislation enacted under Article 253 of the Constitution, which empowers Parliament to make laws for implementing international treaties and agreements, following the 1972 Stockholm Conference on Human Environment. Therefore, only two statements (2 and 4) are correct.

The static concept

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, focusing on delegated legislation and the principle of prior environmental clearance.

From the news: SC verdict in a case paves way for continuation of PRLIS, SSMPP

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q6 · International Relations · India's Bilateral Relations, Treaties & Military

Recent discussions around potential unilateral sanctions have highlighted the interplay between national laws and international trade rules. In this context, consider the following pairs:

  1. 1.GATT Article I — Principle of non-discriminatory trade between WTO members (Most-Favoured-Nation)
  2. 2.CAATSA — A multilateral framework under the UN to enforce sanctions on specified countries
  3. 3.GATT Article XXI — Permits measures a member considers necessary for its essential security interests
  4. 4.India's S-400 Deal — Triggered a formal, published CAATSA waiver from the U.S. President

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

  1. AOnly one pair
  2. BOnly two pairsCorrect answer
  3. COnly three pairs
  4. DAll four pairs

Why this answer

Two pairs are correctly matched. The pair matching GATT Article I with the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) principle of non-discriminatory trade is correct. The pair matching GATT Article XXI with the national security exception is also correct. However, the pair describing CAATSA is incorrect; it is a unilateral United States federal law, not a multilateral UN framework. The pair regarding India's S-400 deal is also incorrect; the U.S. has not issued a formal, published waiver for India, but rather has exercised 'silent non-determination' by not officially designating the transaction as sanctionable.

The static concept

Interplay of Unilateral Sanctions (e.g., CAATSA) and Multilateral Trade Rules (WTO/GATT), and their impact on India's strategic autonomy and foreign policy.

From the news: U.S. Senate fast-tracks Act that could see 100% tariffs on India for its Russian oil imports

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q7 · Environment · Indian Wildlife Conservation

The success of tiger conservation in India, often highlighted on occasions like Global Tiger Day, is underpinned by a specific legal and institutional framework. In this context, consider the following statements:

  1. 1.The National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) is a statutory body constituted under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
  2. 2.The Minister in charge of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change is the Chairperson of the National Tiger Conservation Authority.
  3. 3.The declaration and notification of 'Critical Tiger Habitats' are undertaken by the Central Government on the recommendation of the NTCA.
  4. 4.The establishment of a Critical Tiger Habitat requires the modification and settlement of rights of forest-dwelling communities, not their mandatory extinguishment without due process.

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. AOnly one
  2. BOnly twoCorrect answer
  3. COnly three
  4. DAll four

Why this answer

Two statements are correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. The National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) is indeed a statutory body, but it was established under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, following the amendment of 2006, not the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Statement 2 is correct. As per the provisions of the WPA, 1972, the Union Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change is the ex-officio Chairperson of the NTCA. Statement 3 is incorrect. Critical Tiger Habitats (CTHs) are notified by the respective State Governments, not the Central Government, based on scientific evidence. Statement 4 is correct. The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, makes it mandatory to complete the process of recognition and vesting of rights of Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers, as per the Forest Rights Act, 2006, before an area is declared a CTH. This involves settlement, not automatic extinguishment of rights.

The static concept

Project Tiger and the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) as established under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

From the news: Global Tiger Day: Proud to say India is home to 70% of its global population, says PM Modi

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q8 · Polity · Fundamental Rights

Recent controversies surrounding the functioning of statutory bodies like the Central Board of Film Certification have highlighted the tension between Fundamental Rights and their permissible restrictions. In this context, consider the following pairs:

  1. 1.Freedom of speech and expression — Decency or morality
  2. 2.Freedom to assemble peaceably and without arms — Friendly relations with foreign States
  3. 3.Freedom to form associations or unions — Interest of the general public
  4. 4.Freedom to practise any profession — Interest of the general public

How many of the above pairs, which match a freedom under Article 19(1) with a valid ground for its restriction under Article 19(2)-(6), are correctly matched?

  1. AOnly one pair
  2. BOnly two pairsCorrect answer
  3. COnly three pairs
  4. DAll four pairs

Why this answer

Two pairs are correctly matched. Pair 1 is correct: The freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) can be restricted on the grounds of 'decency or morality' as per Article 19(2). Pair 2 is incorrect: The freedom to assemble peaceably under Article 19(1)(b) can be restricted under Article 19(3) only on grounds of 'sovereignty and integrity of India' and 'public order'. 'Friendly relations with foreign States' is a ground for restricting freedom of speech under Article 19(2), not assembly. Pair 3 is incorrect: The freedom to form associations under Article 19(1)(c) can be restricted under Article 19(4) on grounds of 'sovereignty and integrity of India', 'public order', and 'morality'. 'Interest of the general public' is a ground for restricting other freedoms like movement and profession under Articles 19(5) and 19(6), not forming associations. Pair 4 is correct: The freedom to practise any profession under Article 19(1)(g) can be restricted under Article 19(6) in the 'interest of the general public'.

The static concept

Article 19: Protection of Certain Rights Regarding Freedom of Speech, etc., and the doctrine of 'Reasonable Restrictions'.

From the news: Hiding the scissors: on the Central Board of Film Certification

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.

Q9 · Environment · Water Resource Management

Assertion (A): In the context of inter-state river water sharing in India, an upper riparian state is restricted from unilaterally constructing any new project that would materially alter the water flow guaranteed to a lower riparian state by a tribunal award.

Reason (R): The doctrine of 'Equitable Apportionment', which governs such disputes, is derived primarily from the Helsinki Rules of 1966 and grants absolute priority to the historical and existing uses of the lower riparian state.

  1. ABoth Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
  2. BBoth Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
  3. CAssertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false.Correct answer
  4. DAssertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.

Why this answer

Assertion (A) is true. The awards of Inter-State River Water Dispute Tribunals, established under an Act of Parliament per Article 262, are binding on the states. These awards create vested rights for the concerned states. An upper riparian state cannot unilaterally take actions that would violate the terms of such an award, as this would undermine the quasi-judicial framework for dispute resolution. Reason (R) is false. It contains two errors. First, while the doctrine of 'Equitable Apportionment' is central to resolving water disputes in India, its legal basis is derived from Supreme Court jurisprudence and constitutional principles, not primarily from international conventions like the Helsinki Rules (which only have persuasive value). Second, the doctrine does not grant 'absolute priority' to the lower riparian state; it calls for a balancing of various factors (like population, contribution to the basin, economic needs) to arrive at an equitable share for all co-basin states. Therefore, A is true but R is false.

The static concept

Article 262 — Adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter-State rivers or river valleys; Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.

From the news: What’s the Cauvery dispute and how does the Mekedatu dam feature in it?

The full Deep Proof for this question — the news angle, the static-dynamic link, the source chapter and an autopsy of every wrong option — lives in the app.